fracturedforearm

Women’s and Children’s Hospital
DEPARTMENT OF PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA

 

GUIDELINES FOR ANAESTHESIA OF THE CHILD WITH A FRACTURED FOREARM

 

1. BACKGROUND:

Common anaesthetic case

“Emergency” case, often conducted after-hours

Deceptively straightforward

No high level evidence available to guide anaesthetic management

 

2. ANAESTHETIC ISSUES

Delayed gastric emptying secondary to:

Trauma

Concurrent opiate use

Uncertain fasting history

Associated other injuries

 

3. PATIENT ASSESSMENT:

Severity of injur(ies). Increased severity associated with increased gastric volume

Pre-injury fasting period. Decreased gastric volume with increased duration, but unpredictable

Post-injury fasting period

Opiate administration

Evidence of “empty stomach” i.e. hungry, bowel sounds. Case reports of massive aspiration despite patient stating they were hungry

Significant PMHx (eg. GORD, hiatus hernia)

 

4. STRATIFY ASPIRATION RISK:

Probable High Risk Factors:

Severe or multiple injuries

Pre-injury fasting period < 2 hours

Post-injury fasting period < 12 hours

Severe pain, opiate administration

Nausea ± vomiting

Significant GORD

 

5. PREMEDICATION:

Anxiolytics as needed

Analgesics as required

Topical LA if IV cannulation pre-induction

Questionable utility of pro-kinetic use in children

 

6. INDUCTION:

No “Gold Standard” technique that will prevent aspiration in all patients

Constant vigilance and preparation to manage intra-operative aspiration is vital, even in patients stratified as “low risk”

 

7. INDUCTION TECHNIQUES (HIGH RISK):

1. Rapid sequence induction with cricoid pressure

Frequently recommended in literature for patients at high risk of gastric aspiration

 

Conflicting evidence of benefit:

ETT (especially uncuffed) doesn’t reliably prevent aspiration

Cricoid pressure may decrease lower oesophageal sphincter tone

Cricoid pressure not routinely used in many countries with no evidence of increased aspiration

Cricoid pressure can hinder intubation

“Failure to intubate”

Suxamethonium exposure

 

2. Gas induction via mask with Sevoflurane ± N2O

Cricoid can also be used after loss of consciousness

Can be combined with patient positioning (lateral, trendelenburg, reverse trendelenburg)

Minimal evidence for positioning, use as per anesthetist preference with awareness of likely issues with position chosen

Instrumentation of the airway usually avoided, but if required, intubation can be performed with a suitable muscle relaxant or under deep volatile anaesthesia alone

 

INDUCTION TECHNIQUES (LOW RISK):

Either a gas or intravenous induction suitable

Airway management with minimal airway instrumentation still prudent due to risk of stimulating vomit reflex and evidence that airway devices (esp. LMA) may decrease lower oesophageal sphincter tone

If use Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA), ProSeal™ possibly more suitable as:

Can pass nasogastric tube to decompress stomach

Minimises stomach insufflation

Passage for regurgitant fluid to exit pharynx

Increasing evidence for use in this setting

 

8. MAINTENANCE:

A modern volatile agent + O2/Air or O2/N2O mixture commonly used to maintain anaesthesia

Analgesia titrated to severity of injury and extent of surgery, good evidence for a multimodal approach. Suitable agents include:

Opiates (fentanyl / morphine)

Paracetamol (IV / PO / PR)

NSAID’s (after discussion with surgeon)

Ensure adequate anaesthetic depth during fracture manipulation to prevent stimulation of vomit reflex

Prophylactic anti-emetics appropriate for most patients due to high incidence of PONV in this age group

If surgery is prolonged, consider use of Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (IPPV) or Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) to minimise work of breathing

 

9. MANAGEMENT OF ASPIRATION:

If aspiration is suspected:

Inform surgeon, cease painful stimuli

Administer 100% O2

Place patient in steep Trendelenburg ± lateral decubitus

Suction down airway with wide bore catheter

Recommence IPPV

Aspiration with LMA should initially be managed with LMA in situ if in proper position, as it will minimse further aspiration, aid suctioning and ventilation

Prudent to perform Bronchoscopy to ensure airways clear of particulate matter

Most patients can be extubated if oxygenation is adequate with minimal supplementation

Post-operative management in high dependency setting appropriate

 

10. EMERGENCE:

Airway device if used should be removed either with the patient deeply anaesthetised or with full return of consciousness

Generally, patients stratified as high risk (if intubated) should be extubated awake in the lateral decubitus position

Routine recovery of patient in the lateral decubitus position is useful as it improves upper airway patency and allows clearing of secretions

Oxygen should be administered during emergence, and suction equipment readily available

 

11. POST OPERATIVE CARE:

Patient should be recovered as per hospital guidelines

Post-operative analgesia / fluids / anti-emetics should be titrated to surgery performed

Most patients can be managed with oral analgesia alone

Consider use of Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) or opioid infusion if pain likely to be severe (eg. open repairs)

 

12. REFERENCES:

Bricker SRW et al. McLuckie A, Nightingale DA. Gastric aspirates after trauma in children. Anaesthesia 1989; 44: 721–4

Marcus RJ et al. Anaesthesia for manipulation of forearm fractures in children: a survey of current practice. Paediatric Anaesthesia 2000; 10: 273–7

Brady M et al. Preoperative fasting for preventing perioperative complications in children. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD005285. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005285

William MS et al. Preoperative Fasting in Children: Review Article. Anesthesia & Analgesia 1999; 89: 80–9

Brimacombe JR et al. Cricoid pressure. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1997; 44(4): 414-25

Tim MC et al. The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2005; 52(7): 739–760

Keller C et al. Aspiration and the laryngeal mask airway: three cases and a review of the literature. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1993 (4): 579–82 (2004)

^TOP FEEDBACK | SITE INDEX | DISCLAIMER | CONTACT | COPYRIGHT | PRIVACY
Printer-friendly version

Last Modified: 30-03-2009 15:07:50